skip to content »

Radioactive dating sample problems

radioactive dating sample problems-25

According to the Nuclear Energy Institute, “[D]ue to […] the relatively small differences between the radionuclide content of MOX and low-enriched uranium (LEU) fuel, the use of MOX fuel did not have a significant impact on the offsite releases of radioactivity.” And the bit about the Russian physicist is simply appealing to authority. This absurd claim is the finding of a study by the Radiation and Public Health Project, a New York-based anti-nuclear power research group.They use dubious methodology to tie a slight increase in hypothyroidism in certain Western states to exposure to iodine-131 from Fukushima – despite the fact that, again, the radiation plume from the water leak hasn’t reached the US.

MOX is not “dirty fuel.” It’s uranium oxide with a small amount of plutonium in it.Because your computer is running an older version of internet browser, it no longer meets the features of modern websites.You can help Amazing Discoveries reduce costs by upgrading or replacing your internet browser with one of the options below.Also, iodine-131 has a half-life of only eight days, meaning none will reach the US anyway.The quote is from Claus Boning, a researcher at the Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research in Kiel, Germany.It’s not even the same thing as fallout from a nuclear event, which is what Fukushima is considered.

The only event that Fukushima can be compared to is the Chernobyl meltdown, and by every comparable measure, Chernobyl was much worse.

Any radiation from the initial incident would be far too weak to do this kind of damage – which is why the NOAA isn’t looking at it as a cause of the sea lion epidemic in California and Oregon.

◦Update: Huffington Post reports that the reactors used “dirty fuel,” a combination of plutonium and uranium (MOX), which means we can never return to this place again.

At this point, Stamper has simply started talking about something else.

Fallout from a nuclear explosion is not at all the same thing as leaking radioactive water.

It’s clear that a lot of people have read it (Stamper claims it’s gotten half a million views) and become extremely frightened. Is there anything to Stamper’s claims of animals being burned, fish becoming inedible and thyroid cancer skyrocketing? Certainly, the leak of radioactive water into the Pacific is dangerous and needs to be fixed.